THE federal government has been diligently trying for several weeks to convince the people that the central issue facing Pakistan is poor governance, but without offering any hope of redemption.
The petrol crisis led to the government`s indictment for somnolence, its incapacity to speak with one voice and its lack of expertise in crisis management. Then came another nationwide electricity breakdown. Both episodes exposed three serious weaknesses in the executive.
First, there is a serious lack of communication between the ministries. It seems the prime minister`s call for monthly reports by the ministries has been ignored or misunderstood. Perhaps the bureaucrats writing these reports recount only their achievements, while they should focus on problems they face and their plans to solve them. This way they will profit from the cabinet`s collective wisdom.
Had this been done the government would have become aware of the problems faced by the cashstrapped PSO and the petroleum ministry much earlier than the appearance of queues at petrol pumps.
In the case of the electricity failure the explanation about attacks on transmission lines was meaningless. The transmission lines have been under attack for years. What everybody wanted to know was the strategy for reducing the impact of disruption of transmission lines.
Secondly, the government`s penchant for playing to the gallery is extremely irritating. Suspending public servants without an investigation used to be a tactic favoured by monarchs and it does not behove an elected, responsible government to employ it.
Thirdly, the government`s inability to collect its dues on time poses a threat to its orderly functioning.The circular debtin the energy sectoris a permanent headache, PSO could not import oil because its clients had not cleared their bills, and electricity supply cannot be regularised because a large number of privileged consumers do not pay their dues.
No explanation can satisfy a common citizen, whose meter is disconnected if he does not pay his bills for two or three months, when he is told that govern-ment offices owe the electricity authorities billions of rupees.
No less serious than the poor management of the energy crisis is the government`s ham-handed treatment of the educational institutions` security needs.
Some of the steps taken to make these institutions secure against terrorist attacks, do not reveal maturity of thinking or even common sense. The schools have been told to raise their boundary walls and employ guards and desist from passing on the burden to the students. Does anyone really believe in the adequacy of such simplistic answers to the threat from an enemy whose cunningness and ability to improvise are no secret? The question whether the government can abdicate its duty to protect the lives of citizens or can pass on its responsibility to them is quite serious and must be squarely faced. The idea that teachers (and students?) should be given arms is not only ridiculous it is also dangerous. If the security forces cannot compete with the terrorists in acquisition of high-grade weapons the people can hardly beat them off with small arms. Less resourceful parties are engaging incompetent and irresponsible guards and there have already been a couple of accidents.
Moreover, the government has overlooked the dangerous consequences of playing on the community`s fears. That the attack on the Peshawar school should have alarmed teachers and parents is understandable but instead of frightening them further, the authorities should have tried to build their confidence in their and the people`s capacity to face all challenges.
Now little children see only the face of fear at home and at school and pick up bits of conversation here and there thatincreases theirfright and their sense of insecurity. Of course it would be foolish to make the people, including children and their mothers, oblivious of the hard times we are facing but complete reliance on the fear factor is equally bad.
The extent to which the state is guilty of abdicating its duty can be gauged from the Punjab government`s new ordinance for the protection of sensitiveinstallations. This is supposed to be an `improvement` on the earlier law which obliged a few premises, such as banks and petrol pumps, to arrange for security accordingto ofhcialdictates.
The list of sensitive installations has been vastly increased to include places of worship and other religious premises, government offices and offices of NGOs or foreign projects, hospitals, banks, moneychangers and offices of financial institutions, firms and companies, industrial units, educational institutions, public parks, private clinics, marriage halls, petrol pumps, CNG stations, jewellery shops, hotels and places of entertainment, and commercial markets, shopping centres and public transport stands.
The only sensitive places left out seem to be the secretariat, police lines and the residences of VIPs, which will continue to be guarded by the state. The owners of all the listed premises will be obliged to arrange for security at their own expense, in accordance with the orders of an official committee. Noncompliance could result in sealing of property, trial and jail for up to six months.
This amounts to making a mockery of governance.
And we are not referring to the crisis of government as revealed in the killing in encounter of the boy who had been arrested for murdering a child after the latter was sodomised. Mujrimon kap qatil zindabad! True, we are facing a grave situation but we will not overcome it by losing our heads and the capacity for rational planning. The people should indeed shoulder some of the burden of security. But let this government-public partnership begin with joint surveys of security needs of all institutions, especially of schools that have no boundary walls and no money to hire guards, and creation of police-citizens committees to organise comprehensive watch-and-ward.
The youth mobilised for this purpose will be better employed than while creating records of uthkakbaithak or preparing the largest national flag.
Halfway houses or immature exercises in the name of security will only increase the crises of governance.•
.jpg)
Comments
Post a Comment